Capable organizations spend enormous effort on things that produce no movement. I study Change Energy: the organization’s practical capacity to convert intention, information, authority, and human effort into changed behavior. As managing partner at Don’t Panic Labs, I work with senior leaders who are trying to move things and have started to suspect that effort is not the same thing as work.
Capable organizations spend enormous effort on things that produce no movement. Not for lack of talent or resources, but because the decisions that shape what actually happens get made long before anyone executes on them. And most teams are not very good at those decisions.
Capable organizations spend enormous effort on things that produce no movement. Not for lack of talent or resources, but because the decisions that shape what actually happens get made long before anyone executes on them. And most teams are not very good at those decisions.
That is what I think about. Why smart organizations build things that shouldn't exist. Why they preserve plans after the evidence contradicts them. Why they create dependence on a handful of heroic individuals instead of building systems that can absorb absence. Why they hide uncertainty rather than test against it. Why they gather information for years without letting it change a decision.
I have spent most of my career inside software, where the gap between effort and movement is unusually visible. But the questions are not really software questions. They are questions about what organizations are actually capable of doing with intention, information, and authority.
I am a managing partner at Don't Panic Labs in Lincoln, Nebraska. The applied work happens there. This site is where the thinking lives.
If you are building something and want to think more clearly about it, that is what I am here for. The best way to talk is on LinkedIn.
Smart, well-funded organizations expend enormous effort and produce no movement. I study why. The talk explains what Change Energy is, where organizational energy gets trapped, and what it takes to convert intention into actual behavior change.
Medicine has malpractice standards. Structural engineering has building codes. Software has hope. I make the case for professional accountability in software product development, drawing on lessons from disciplines that figured this out centuries ago.
Most product ideas fail not because they are technically infeasible, but because the founder is in love with the solution instead of the problem. I use the Mechanical Turk story to explore the psychology of entrepreneurial self-deception, and the cheapest test you can run to find out which kind of love you have. With AI, that test costs even less.
I’m available for conferences, corporate events, and panels. Find me on LinkedIn to discuss topics, format, and availability.